![]() I was typing the above while you were posting. So far as I know, Aperture does not yet have even the framework for dealing with lens correction data in RAW, much less the specific parameters for particular lenses. ![]() And things are getting worse not better since some makers (including Panasonic) are now putting lens correction information in the RAW file. DNG seems to be rather a kind of universal _wrapper_ for a bunch of data that has manufacturer dependent stuff in it. A few years back Adobe hyped a good idea beyond reality. The idea that DNGs are universal is widespread but, unfortunately, not true. Unfortunately I have not found anything about doing it with Panasonic G Series cameras. There are instructions on the net for doing this with some Olympus files, I think. and 2) sometimes it is possible to edit the plist for Aperture to make it think that unsupported files from Camera X are actually from Camera Y (a close relative from the same maker that is supported) and then Aperture will open the Camera X files and treat them like files from Camera Y. Slight modifications to the above: 1) I think that Aperture will _import_ RAW and DNG files it won't open so that eventually, when the files are supported, you could go back and process them. You (and I) are among many who devoutly wish Apple would get moving and support a number of cameras that have been widely available for a long time. Once it _does_ support a camera, then you can import either RAW directly or DNGs made from the RAW. Until Apple supports a camera, you can't process its RAW or DNGs. Here's what think is the case:Īperture only processes DNGs if they are converted from RAW files that it understands.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |